Yes, the real race has begun. As Romney picks Paul Ryan as his Vice President, liberal heads starting exploding. Many liberal pundits speculated Romney would choose a safe candidate such as Portman or Pawlenty. Ryan states in a big way that the Romney/Ryan ticket is extremely serious about the country's debt service and anemic economy. Ryan is a numbers man. He understands economics and he articulates it as well as anyone I've ever seen. One thing I've noticed is Romney seems energized and invigorated about his choice. Now, the liberals will have to talk about the issues and not as much about Romney's tax returns. My side note, I'm more concerned what Obama is doing with the American taxpayer's money than I am what Romney does with his own money. I've been away and not paying much attention to the news, however, I enjoy how the DNC and White House sends out the talking points to the main stream media. What I did hear was John Sinunu, former Governor of New Hampshire, school Juan Williams on Fox news and then, Soledad O'Brien on CNN (I think it was CNN, nobody watches CNN anymore). Over the weekend, I heard Rich Lowry eviscerate MSNBC's darling, Rachel Maddow. She was stumbling and couldn't find an answer, in which Lowry made fun of her. And last but not least, CNN's Wolf Blitzer hammered DNC Chair, Debbie Was A Man Schultz over the Ryan Medicare plan her lying and deliberately spreading misinformation that has metastasized through the liberal ranks. The bottom line is Obama's plan is to take 716 billion (also, I've heard 719 and 746 billion) from Medicare, basically to pay for Obama care. I guess blatant lying is totally acceptable in politics? I know that is a ridiculous statement. Lying and politics go together like peas and carrots! Moving on to the controversy, Obama's plan cuts 716 billion dollars from Medicare to fund Obama Care over the next ten years. Ryan's plan does not effect anyone 55 years or older, period. For people 54 and younger, there would be an option to stay in the same exact plan or receive a voucher for private insurance. Ryan's plan doesn't rob medicare. How can the democrats say it doesn't hurt seniors when the plan takes almost three quarters of a trillion dollars? For the next 82 days, we must be very visible and promote the truth. I realize lying seems to be the norm, the conservatives need to change the narrative. I believe Romney and Ryan will do exactly that. Americans will come together and rally to change the tenants of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue on November 6, 2012.
Path to Prosperity:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Path_to_Prosperity
Romney/Ryan Medicare commercial:
Wolf Blitzer hammers Debbie Wasserman Schultz on false Medicare claims:
John Sinunu schools Soledad O'Brien on Medicare:
Obama's 'Shared Prosperity'
At one of four fundraisers in Illinois yesterday, the President of the United States said, "Chicago is an example of what makes this country great." This in the city where a former ballet dancer-turned mayor called in Minister Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam to police the mean streets and turned awayChick-fil-A for taking a stand for traditional marriage.
But that wasn't the worst of it. At one fundraiser held at Bridgeport Art Center, the always upbeat and encouraging Obama, speaking on behalf of "many folks" and leaving his failed policies out of the equation, said "Too many folks still don't have a sense that tomorrow will be better than today. And so, the question in this election is which way do we go?"
Immediately after asking that question the President answered it himself. Seems Obama doesn't like the old America, and the direction he wants to head is "forward" to "a new vision of an America in which prosperity is shared," not earned.
Common ownership of personal property is a bold platform to campaign on for a second term, especially for a man who was warned by his wife to stay away from the fried Twinkies at the state fair.
Nonetheless, in Obama's new America, the government controls profits in much the same way Michelle controls what and how much Barry eats. Quite simply, the Obama plan is to have the federal government seize property from the prosperous and distribute it as he sees fit, and then after redistributing other people's wealth, justifying the confiscation of personal property as being necessary to establish fairness and maintain the common good.
According to Obama, anything short of "sharing the wealth" would be moving backward. Obama said,
"I believe we have to go forward. I believe we have to keep working to create an America where no matter who you are, no matter what you look like, no matter where you come from, no matter what your last name is, no matter who you love, you can make it here if you try."
What American doesn't believe that "you can make it here if you try?" Those are certainly old American values. Unless Barack Obama's idea of "trying" means that any amount of effort suffices, and if you at least try a little but fail to prosper, then a person who's worked harder and has prospered more will be compelled under government edict to help you "make it."
Sharing prosperity can only mean that those who have prospered will be forced to relinquish an even greater portion of their good fortune. That is how, in Obama's "new America," a better; more equal tomorrow will be furthered for everyone - except hardworking people whose earnings will be forcibly purloined.
But despite his plans to take yet another step closer to "fundamentally transforming the United States of America" from something old into something new, there is still a playful side to President Obama. At the Iowa state fair, a few days after introducing his "new America" spiel and in lieu of forbidden fried Twinkies, Barack Obama used the occasion to exhibit allegiance to fair-mindedness and equality by mentioning both the "butter cow" and the "chocolate moose."
Then, after referring to the moo and the moose, a disappointed Obama said he was forbidden by the Secret Service to use the bumper cars, which would have provided the President the perfect vehicle for an Iowa state fair object lesson to illustrate the direction he plans to take in his "new America," where prosperity -- and everything else that happens -- is shared.
Author's content: www.jeannie-ology.com
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/08/obamas_shared_prosperity.html#ixzz23Zikigk3
Lefty Funnies:
You can't make this stuff up:
Biden - "They are going to put y'all back in chains." Racist remark
Obama - "That will go good with my pok chops." Love the slang
Pelosi - Contempt vote is about voter suppression, not Fast and Furious."
Clueless in San Francisco.
John Kerry - "I served in Viet Nam." (perpetual)
Quote du jour:
I am not a friend to a very energetic government. It is always oppressive.
Thomas Jefferson
Constitution of the United States
Bill of Rights
VI. Right to a speedy trial, witnesses, etc.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
References:
www.hotair.com
www.theblaze.com
www.dailycaller.com
www.wnd.com
www.youtube.com
www.ratical.org
www.cnsnews.com
www.quotefulness.com
www.americanthinker.com
Jeannie DeAngelis
Hiya! I am curious if you have a lot of traffic on your blog?
ReplyDelete