Obamagasm to Obamaspasm in 90 minutes!

Opinion 2.0
Last night, my Wife and I sat down to watch the Presidential debate. We sat in amazement watching Romney dominate Obama. Is it just me? Or did Obama look like he would rather be anywhere than the debate. Lackluster, unprepared,  
defensive and un-Presidential. On the other hand, Romney showed command of the topics, extremely prepared, confident, compassionate and ready for anything Obama threw at him. The moderator, Jim Lehrer did his best. However, he was outclassed by Romney and Obama. Let's face it, Obama cannot defend a dismal economy, 23 million unemployed, 43 months of unemployment over 8%, 47 million on food stamps, 2 credit downgrades, complete foreign policy failure, divisiveness and smug, narcissistic, arrogant attitude that is not willing to work with the other side. That would a miracle to talk your way out of this debacle. Ironically, all of the main stream media and Obama's minions are spinning this just like I thought they would. I thought they would have to call 911 for the pundits of MSNBC. "Special Ed" Schultz, Chris "thrill up my leg" Matthews, Rachel Maddow and others were beside themselves. CNN, ABC, CBS declared Romney the winner. Romney called Obama a liar without calling him a liar with the 5 Sons statement. Romney rebutted every point Obama made. Obama hardly rebutted Romney. How could he? The facts are the facts.

Romney/Obama debate:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/dkrwUU_YApE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I must admit, I have been a little down in respect to the way Romney/Ryan have been running their campaign. After last night, I feel invigorated and ready to fight the good fight for the next 33 days. I happily await the Paul Ryan/Joe Biden Vice Presidential debate. Ryan will eviscerate Biden. Ryan is a numbers man. Biden is a fool. I am popping popcorn and buying Coronas for that debate, not to mention, recording that program so I can watch it when I need a lift and/or laugh. 
After the Presidential debate, I watched the liberal news programs to see how they spin the debate. Chris Matthews almost cried. The main street media has created a Deity Presidential figure. Obamatuer was never vetted. After Obama was elected, in an interview, Tom Brokaw had the nerve to say that we don't know anything about Obama. Their job is to vet and find out everything about a potential Presidential candidate. They investigated George W. Bush's military experience in the Air National Guard 10 times. They had 24 thousand emails from Sarah Palin. But, they didn't know anything about the anointed one. If you read any of Obama's books, you could decipher a lot about the man and his ideology. I've posted before, Obama is an anti-Colonialist, just like his Father and Grandfather. He blames America for the plight of the rest of the world. His mentors are communists (Frank Marshall Davis), Domestic terrorists (Bill Ayers, Bernadean Dorn), Racists (Reverend Wrong Wright) and Father Flagler, anti Semites (Kahlid Rashidi) and last but not least, Criminal Tony Rezko who sold Obama an expensive house in Chicago really cheap. With friends like this, Obama should be serving time. But that is the Chicago way. The next 33 days will be war. The liberals will do anything and everything to tarnish and belittle Romney and Ryan. I assume they will go after his Mormon religion, Bain Capital, Income, he beats puppies and smacks old ladies! 
We must be steadfast and handle the onslaught of character assassinations. I read there are 42 million Tea Party members ready to vote for Romney. I hope the Ron Paul people will come to their senses and put their support on Romney.  Please get involved. I realize we get caught up in our lives, however, we must save our country not so much for us, but for our kids and grand kids. Vote and get 5 neighbors to vote. We can persevere!

Obama racially charged speech 1997:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Mv0h7HEGHEM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Liberal Laughs:

Biden: You’re darned right Obama and I want to raise a trillion dollars in new taxes

POSTED AT 5:21 PM ON OCTOBER 4, 2012 BY ALLAHPUNDIT

  

Via BuzzFeed, reminds of the end of “A Few Good Men,” i.e. a ruinous admission against interest made in a fit of bravado by one of America’s sexiest grandpas. Who ordered the code red on the economy? Obama did, baby. And damned proud of it. See now why Romney’s taken to selling “Honest Joe” t-shirts in his campaign store?

This comes less than a day after The Hill published a piece titled, ominously, “Obama lets Biden talk off-script.” If you want to know what that means in practice, here you go:

One of his interactions, which was particularly priceless, occurred as Mr. Biden stopped at a food counter and poured himself a cup of vegetable beef soup while lamenting that he had to take it to go in order not to be late for the rally.

“They’re hard on me, man,” Mr. Biden said to his fellow shoppers. “This vice president stuff is tough.”…

Mr. Biden also chatted with a woman named Karen Foley, who told the reporter in attendance he jokingly introduced himself as “Joe Finnegan” because she had an Irish last name. When Ms. Foley responded that she was aware of who Mr. Biden really was, she said he responded with a compliment.

“You’re very pretty,” he said.

This is the guy they’re banking on for a debate rebound next week. Against Paul Ryan.

Exit question: Which angle does the GOP take in attacking Obama over this clip? Presumably it’ll be the usual pushback on taxing job creators, which is an especially bad idea when the economy’s still straining to cope with Obamanomics, but I hope someone gently reminds the middle class that even a trillion dollars in new taxes on the rich won’t get us out from under the debt load of Great Society II. If you want Obama-style spending and entitlements, you — Joe Sixpack — had better be prepared to start kicking in a bunch more. I’m hoping Ryan brings this up next week, but given the fears of Mediscaring down the stretch, he might be under orders to tread lightly.

Former Medicare Chief: Wealth Redistribution a ‘Fact About Proper Health Care’

By Elizabeth Harrington

October 4, 2012

Subscribe to Elizabeth Harrington's posts

    

Dr. Donald Berwick. (AP Photo/Goodman Media International, Inc.)

(CNSNews.com) – Former Medicare Chief Don Berwick defended his past statements that government run health care must redistribute wealth, calling redistribution a “fact about proper health care.”

Berwick, who appeared at a Politico“Pro Health Care” luncheon at the Newseum in Washington, D.C., on Thursday, told CNSNews.com that the Affordable Care Act, a.k.a. Obamacare, is an “amazing and important step” for the country.

CNSNews.com asked Berwick, a proponent of the government-run National Health Service in England, if the health reform passed in this country aligns with his views.

“You have said that any health care system that is civilized and humane must redistribute wealth and also that rationing would have to be involved,” CNSNews.com asked.  “Do you believe that the Affordable Care Act does those two things?”

“Well, I never said rationing should be involved, and it shouldn’t be,” the former administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said.  “I’m against rationing.  I abhor it.  I think we have plenty of resources in American health care to give all the care that people want and need. We just have to configure that care properly.”

“So, we don’t have to deny people any care at all,” he said.  “And the people that say that about my position haven’t asked me that, it’s not true.”

“With respect to … redistribution, yeah, this is a fact and there’s a relationship between poverty or income and health,” Berwick said.

“So, if you’re going to have a health care system that actually makes sure that everybody can get health care, there’ll naturally be support to people of low-income because they’re the people with more illness,” he said.   “That’s the redistributional quality of it.”

“It just, it’s not a political position,” he added.  “It’s a fact about proper health care.”

CNSNews.com then asked, “And that’s what the Affordable Care Act, does it do an adequate job of that?”

Berwick said, “The Affordable Care Act is a great step in America towards making health care a human right in our country where if you’re an American you can get health care, which isn’t true now, lots of people are left out of the system, people have to worry they’re going to lose their insurance if they get sick, or if they have a preexisting condition, they can’t find insurance.”

President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden react to cheers as they arrive in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Tuesday, March 23, 2010, for the signing ceremony for the health care bill. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

“The Affordable Care Act overcomes that -- it says, ‘No, if you’re an American you can have health care.  We’ll find one way or another,’ in partnership with the private sector to make sure that you get the health care that you need,” he said.

“That’s a very important step,” said Berwick.

CNSNews.com then asked Berwick to clarify his past statement that, “The decision is not whether or not we will ration care — the decision is whether we will ration with our eyes open.”

“That’s a mis -- that’s extracted from a longer statement,” he said.  “What I was talking about was insurance companies right now decide what benefits you get or not.  They say, ‘Well that’s covered, that’s not covered.’  And then they do it in secret.”

“Nobody’s accountable,” Berwick said.  “Nobody says, ‘Well, how did you decide that?  How did you decide I can’t have that test?’  That’s rationing.”

“And I said, look, we have a choice America,” he said.  “We can let them do that in secret or we can require them with transparency to tell us what they’re doing.  That’s a comment about accountability with these back rooms where decisions are being made about what people will and will not get.”

Berwick continued: “My own daughter needed a test a number of years ago -- I’m a doctor, a pediatrician -- and the insurance company said, ‘Oh no, we don’t cover that test.’  And I said, ‘You don’t cover that test?  She needs it, what are you talking about?  Who made that decision?’  And that’s what I was talking about there.”

“We’re either going to turn the lights on on that or not,” he said.  “I think that decision should be accountable and I think that people should get the health care that they want.”

In an interview with Biotechnology Healthcare in 2009, Berwick was asked about critics of the Department of Health and Human Services’s Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) program, which makes recommendations for treatments, who say it will lead to healthcare rationing.

“We can make a sensible social decision and say, ‘Well, at this point, to have access to a particular additional benefit [new drug or medical intervention] is so expensive that our taxpayers have better use for those funds,’” Berwick said.  “We make those decisions all the time. The decision is not whether or not we will ration care — the decision is whether we will ration with our eyes open. And right now, we are doing it blindly.”

In a speech in England celebrating its government-run National Health Service in 2008, Berwick said:  “Any health care funding plan that is just, equitable, civilized and humane must – must -- redistribute wealth from the richer among us to the poorer and the less fortunate. Excellent health care is by definition redistributional. Britain, you chose well.”

Thursday’s event in Washington, D.C. took place one day after the first presidential debate between President Obama and his challenger Mitt Romney, of which Berwick said the president “did a great job” defending his health care law.

“I think he did a great job,” said Berwick.  “And I think that the good thing is Obamacare is, it’s an amazing and important new step for America. So, he’s got a lot of opportunity here to explain to Americans why this law is so good for them.  It makes care more available to all of us who really need it, and it makes care better.”

“There’s tremendous amount of Obamacare that’s an investment in making the quality of health care better,” Berwick added.  “So, I think he did a fine job.”

*Daniel Berwick is a major liberal/socialist. He believes in Redistribution and Government healthcare.

    

Quote of the week:

"The middle class has been "buried" during the past four years."

Vice President Joe "Gaffemaster" Biden

Founding Fathers

Bill of Rights

Amendment VIII

Bail, fines, punishment

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

References:
www.hotair.com
www.cnsnews.com
www.theblaze.com
www.dailycaller.com
www.wnd.com
www.allahpundit.com
Elizabeth Harrington
www.realclearpolitics.com
www.rwbnews.com
www.youtube.com
www.radical.org

Romney v. Obama - Will America Survive?

Opinion 2.0

Being a staunch conservative and viewing everything all the time concerning news and political news, I find myself thoroughly disgusted with the serial lying and misinformation being leveled by politicians, pundits and Super Pacs. Back in the day, people actually told the truth for the most part. Campaign dueling has been going on since the inception of our great nation. In retrospect, the last three Presidential election cycles has been incredibly insulting to anyone with half a brain. This goes for both sides of the aisle. Romney eviscerated Gringrich in the Republican Presidential candidate race. Some, I thought were totally unfair. We must face the facts, Obama is a ruthless, narcissistic, Chicago corrupt political machine politician, who will say anything and do anything to stay in office. So, do we want another John McCain? Nice and fair? Or do we want a pit bull, who will take the fight to the opponent? I would like to see more of the latter. Mitt Romney is a wonderful man. He has done so much for so many. He gave over 4 million dollars (30%) to charity last year alone. How much did Barry and Biden give? They are only good at spending our money. 

Mitt Romney wasn't my first choice, yes, I've grown to like and support him. I believe this election will be more about removing Obama more than the Romney/Ryan ticket. I do believe the Romney/Ryan ticket is a formidable one. I think it is very similar to removing Bush, not about Obama. A few post ago, I posted 1001 reasons not to vote for Obama (July 18, 2012). That article re-opened my eyes to how many crooked and anti-American deeds he perpetrated on America and our Constitution. The main stream media has totally sold out to Obama. They used to try to hide it. Now, it is in our faces, ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, NPR, Univision and so on, blatantly back the Obama/Biden ticket. Calm down, I know that is a huge surprise! Reluctantly, many of the democrats, so-called journalists, pundits, business leaders and others have begun to turn on Obama, his narcissism, his hubris and fraudulent manners, outright lying and socialistic policies. And for the icing on the cake, if anything happened to Obama, Biden would become President! Lunch bucket Joe is a complete idiot and an embarrassment to the Office of the Vice President.

My Wife and I went to see 2016, Obama's America. It was an eye opener to say the least. I've posted about Obama's anti-Colonialist's tendencies before, but I didn't realize how deeply rooted they were with his Father and Grandfather. Barry's Grandfather paired Barry up with Frank Marshall Davis as a mentor.  A communist/activist who would have been arrested by the FBI as a threat, if we would have gone to war with Russia. Saul Alinsky, Reverend Wright, Bill Ayers and Bernadean Dorn (American terrorists) are the colleagues Obama cares to associate with. This is part, defines the man that has attempted to fundamentally change America. If you love this country, why would you try to fundamentally change it? Obama wants to diminish the United States to the status of just another country. Not a super power, we must pay for our wealth and reimburse the rest of the world for his belief, that America got rich by raping the resources of other countries. If Obama is re-elected, America will seize to exist. He said in 1998, along with his redistribution remarks, that welfare recipients are a strong and viable coalition. (Paraphrased) Pathetic! The media protects Obama and his gaffes daily. One of his latest gaffes concerning the turmoil in the Middle East was as Obama called it, "A bump in the road." I doubt Ambassador Chris Stevens and the other three brave men who died in the Benghazi terrorist attack would consider it that a disgraceful remark. 

In summation, because I could go on for days, Obama, his administration and policies have been a dismal failure. Economic, foreign, social and monetary policies have failed because of his ideology. If this man gets four more years, he will do whatever he wants, since he will not have to answer to the American people again. Please talk with five friends and make sure they get out to vote. Tell them to get five people and so on. We can do it, we have to do it for our children and grandchildren... We will take back America!

Those silly Democrats!:

Typical Obama voter:

When will Obama crack in public?

By Mychal Massie

At a time when many Americans can barely afford Burger King and a movie, Obama boasts of spending a billion dollars on his re-election campaign. Questioned at a recent appearance about the spiraling fuel costs, Obama said, "Get used to it" ˆ and with an insouciant grin an chortle, he told another person at the event, who complained about the effect high fuel prices were having on his family, to "get a more fuel-efficient car."

The Obamas behave as if they were sharecroppers living in a trailer and hit the Powerball, but instead of getting new tires for their trailer and a new pickup truck, they moved to Washington . And instead of making possum pie, with goats and chickens in the front yard, they're spending and living large at taxpayer expense ˆ opulent vacations, gala balls resplendent dinners and exclusive command performances at the White House, grand date nights, golf, basketball, more golf, exclusive resorts and still more golf. In the 1950's they called it acting NIGGER RICH.

Expensive, ill-fitting and ill-chosen wigs and fashions hardly befit the first lady of the United States . The Obamas have behaved in every way but presidential ˆ which is why it's so offensive when we hea Obama say, in order "to restore fiscal responsibility, we all need to share in the sacrifice ˆ but we don't have to sacrifice the America w believe in."

The American people have been sacrificing; it is he and his family who are behaving as if they've never had two nickels to rub together ˆ and now, having hit the mother lode, they're going to spend away their feelings of inadequacy at the taxpayers' expense.

Obama continues to exhibit behavior that, at best, can be described as mobocratic and, at worst, reveals a deeply damaged individual. In a February 2010 column, I asked, "Is Obama unraveling? "I wrote that it was beginning to appear the growing mistrust of him and contempt for his policies was beginning to have a destabilizing effect on him.

At that time, I wrote that not having things go one's way can be a bitter pill, but reasonable people don't behave as he was behaving. He had insulted Republicans at their luncheon, where he had been an invited guest. I had speculated that was, in part, what had led him to falsely accuse Supreme Court justices before Congress, the nation and the world, during the 2010 State of the Union address.

It appeared, at that time, as if he were "fraying around the emotional edges." That behavior has not abated ˆ it has become more pronounced While addressing the nation, after being forced to explain the validity of his unilateral aggression with Libya , America witnessed a petulant individual scowling and scolding the public for daring to insist he explain his actions.

But during an afternoon speech to address the budget/debt, he took his scornful, unstable despotic behavior to depths that should give the nation cause for concern. Displaying a dark psychopathy more representative of an episode of "The Tudors" television series, he invited Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., to sit in the front row during his speech and then proceeded to berate both Ryan and Ryan's budget-cutting plan. Even liberal Democrats were put off by the act. MSNBC's Joe Scarborough questioned the sanity of Obama's actions.

Today, criticism is coming from all sides. A senior Democrat lawmaker said, "I have been very disappointed in [Obama], to the point where I'm embarrassed that I endorsed him. It's so bad that some of us are thinking, is there some way we can replace him? How do you get rid of this guy?" ("Democrats' Disgust with Obama," The Daily Beast, April 15, 2011)

Steve McCann wrote: Obama's speech "was chock full of lies, deceit and crass fear-mongering. It must be said that [he] is the most dishonest, deceitful and mendacious person in a position of power I have ever witnessed" ("The Mendacity of Barack Obama,"AmericanThinker.com , April 15, 2011).

McCann continued: "[His] performance was the culmination of four years of outright lies and narcissism that have been largely ignored by the media, including some in the conservative press and political class who are loath to call [him] what he is in the bluntest of terms: a liar and a fraud. That he relies on his skin color to intimidate, either outright or by insinuation [against] those who oppose his radical agenda only add to his audacity. It is apparent that he has gotten away with his character flaws his entire life, aided and abetted by sycophants around him. ..."

With these being among the kinder rebukes being directed at Obama, and with people becoming less intimidated by his willingness to use race as a bludgeon, with falling poll numbers in every meaningful category and an increasingly aggressive tea-party opposition ˆ how much longer before he crack completely?

The coming months of political life are not going to be pleasant for Obama. Possessed by a self-perceived palatine mindset, that in his mind places him above criticism, how long before he cracks in public? Can America risk a man with a documented track record of lying and misrepresenting truth as a basic way of life, who is becoming increasingly more contumelious?

Hope you forward this to everyone in your address book as we are going to need every vote we can get to remove Obama. The liberals are just unable to absorb what he is doing to our country and will continue to vote for him. Just imagine what he will do to America if he gets another term !

Left Turns:

Founding Fathers

Bill of Rights

Article VII - No Compulsory Taxation
The government shall extract no compulsory tax or involuntary contribution of any kind from any citizen for any purpose whatsoever.

Quote du jour:
Say nothing of my religion. It is known to God and myself alone. Its evidence before the world is to be sought in my life: if it has been honest and dutiful to society the religion which has regulated it cannot be a bad one.
Thomas Jefferson

References:
www.youtube.com
www.realclearpolitics.com
Mychal Massie
www.quotationspage.com
www.theblaze.com
www.dailycaller.com
www.freeradical.com
www.nro.com

The 716 Billion dollar lie

Opinion 2.0
Yes, the real race has begun. As Romney picks Paul Ryan as his Vice President, liberal heads starting exploding. Many liberal pundits speculated Romney would choose a safe candidate such as Portman or Pawlenty. Ryan states in a big way that the Romney/Ryan ticket is extremely serious about the country's debt service and anemic economy. Ryan is a numbers man. He understands economics and he articulates it as well as anyone I've ever seen. One thing I've noticed is Romney seems energized and invigorated about his choice. Now, the liberals will have to talk about the issues and not as much about Romney's tax returns. My side note, I'm more concerned what Obama is doing with the American taxpayer's money than I am what Romney does with his own money. I've been away and not paying much attention to the news, however, I enjoy how the DNC and White House sends out the talking points to the main stream media. What I did hear was John Sinunu, former Governor of New Hampshire, school Juan Williams on Fox news and then, Soledad O'Brien on CNN (I think it was CNN, nobody watches CNN anymore). Over the weekend, I heard Rich Lowry eviscerate MSNBC's darling, Rachel Maddow. She was stumbling and couldn't find an answer, in which Lowry made fun of her. And last but not least, CNN's Wolf Blitzer hammered DNC Chair, Debbie Was A Man Schultz over the Ryan Medicare plan her lying and deliberately spreading misinformation that has metastasized through the liberal ranks. The bottom line is Obama's plan is to take 716 billion (also, I've heard 719 and 746 billion) from Medicare, basically to pay for Obama care. I guess blatant lying is totally acceptable in politics? I know that is a ridiculous statement. Lying and politics go together like peas and carrots! Moving on to the controversy, Obama's plan cuts 716 billion dollars from Medicare to fund Obama Care over the next ten years. Ryan's plan does not effect anyone 55 years or older, period. For people 54 and younger, there would be an option to stay in the same exact plan or receive a voucher for private insurance. Ryan's plan doesn't rob medicare. How can the democrats say it doesn't hurt seniors when the plan takes almost three quarters of a trillion dollars? For the next 82 days, we must be very visible and promote the truth. I realize lying seems to be the norm, the conservatives need to change the narrative. I believe Romney and Ryan will do exactly that. Americans will come together and rally to change the tenants of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue on November 6, 2012. 

Path to Prosperity:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Path_to_Prosperity

Romney/Ryan Medicare commercial:


Wolf Blitzer hammers Debbie Wasserman Schultz on false Medicare claims:


John Sinunu schools Soledad O'Brien on Medicare:

Obama's 'Shared Prosperity'

Jeannie DeAngelis

At one of four fundraisers in Illinois yesterday, the President of the United States said, "Chicago is an example of what makes this country great." This in the city where a former ballet dancer-turned mayor called in Minister Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam to police the mean streets and turned awayChick-fil-A for taking a stand for traditional marriage.

But that wasn't the worst of it.  At one fundraiser held at Bridgeport Art Center, the always upbeat and encouraging Obama, speaking on behalf of "many folks" and leaving his failed policies out of the equation, said "Too many folks still don't have a sense that tomorrow will be better than today. And so, the question in this election is which way do we go?"

Immediately after asking that question the President answered it himself.  Seems Obama doesn't like the old America, and the direction he wants to head is "forward" to "a new vision of an America in which prosperity is shared," not earned.

Common ownership of personal property is a bold platform to campaign on for a second term, especially for a man who was warned by his wife to stay away from the fried Twinkies at the state fair.

Nonetheless, in Obama's new America, the government controls profits in much the same way Michelle controls what and how much Barry eats.  Quite simply, the Obama plan is to have the federal government seize property from the prosperous and distribute it as he sees fit, and then after redistributing other people's wealth, justifying the confiscation of personal property as being necessary to establish fairness and maintain the common good. 

According to Obama, anything short of "sharing the wealth" would be moving backward.  Obama said,

"I believe we have to go forward. I believe we have to keep working to create an America where no matter who you are, no matter what you look like, no matter where you come from, no matter what your last name is, no matter who you love, you can make it here if you try." 

What American doesn't believe that "you can make it here if you try?"  Those are certainly old American values. Unless Barack Obama's idea of "trying" means that any amount of effort suffices, and if you at least try a little but fail to prosper, then a person who's worked harder and has prospered more will be compelled under government edict to help you "make it."

Sharing prosperity can only mean that those who have prospered will be forced to relinquish an even greater portion of their good fortune. That is how, in Obama's "new America," a better; more equal tomorrow will be furthered for everyone - except hardworking people whose earnings will be forcibly purloined.

But despite his plans to take yet another step closer to "fundamentally transforming the United States of America" from something old into something new, there is still a playful side to President Obama.  At the Iowa state fair, a few days after introducing his "new America" spiel and in lieu of forbidden fried Twinkies, Barack Obama used the occasion to exhibit allegiance to fair-mindedness and equality by mentioning both the "butter cow" and the "chocolate moose."

Then, after referring to the moo and the moose, a disappointed Obama said he was forbidden by the Secret Service to use the bumper cars, which would have provided the President the perfect vehicle for an Iowa state fair object lesson to illustrate the direction he plans to take in his "new America," where prosperity -- and everything else that happens -- is shared.

Author's content: www.jeannie-ology.com

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/08/obamas_shared_prosperity.html#ixzz23Zikigk3

Lefty Funnies:

You can't make this stuff up:
Biden - "They are going to put y'all back in chains."   Racist remark
Obama - "That will go good with my pok chops."       Love the slang
Pelosi - Contempt vote is about voter suppression, not Fast and Furious."
Clueless in San Francisco.
John Kerry - "I served in Viet Nam."  (perpetual)

Quote du jour:
I am not a friend to a very energetic government. It is always oppressive.
Thomas Jefferson

Constitution of the United States

Bill of Rights 

VI. Right to a speedy trial, witnesses, etc.

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

References:

www.hotair.com

www.theblaze.com

www.dailycaller.com

www.wnd.com

www.youtube.com

www.ratical.org

www.cnsnews.com

www.quotefulness.com

www.americanthinker.com

Jeannie DeAngelis